Veilan wrote:I have to say, though, that the toughness restriction was publicised and stickied from day one, so the "I didn't know" argument seems flimsy.
Not at all, and i don't see the reason to attack the player like this. You want the player to go somewhere else because
you think he's lying to me? Is this the same Veilan i used to know some years back? Hello? You still in there somewhere?
Not everyone visits the forums, nor is it a requirement to do so. These forums are overloaded with subforums and have way too many 'vague titled' stickies. There is no information on the wiki about it, and the APM does not indicate it.
But, more important than any of this... it's a problem for both players and DMs. It does not serve a useful purpose, it only creates a problem and restricts a pc from becoming a dwarven defender if he chooses to become one "after" initial creation. This goes counter to ALFA's recommendations to allow PCs to develop in time, rather than PG-develop the character construct far in advance.
Imagine he'd have violated a rule on the server he plays on - then, also, ignorance is no real excuse. I'm quite sure a helpful DM may offer him his rebuild, however I reject the general notion that we cannot require a minimum of self-informing by members.
You're absolutely right Veilan, everyone should find this sticky, buried in this forum, and find in it a very small sentence indicating toughness is available at level 1 only. Let's ban him for having the audacity to question the status quo.
Oh hey, what-ya know, this thread
isn't stickied. I found it using the search tool.
