And well said.ç i p h é r wrote:I'll see your Memoirs of a HausFrau, and raise you this:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl ... mccai.html
'Nuff said.
Palin crushes the farce of modern feminism. NOW's statement on Palin says she's against womens' rights. Apparently, according to them, the only right women have is to kill their unborn children. Sounds pretty sexist to me. With all of the questioning she's gotten about whether she could care for her new baby and be VP at the same time, you'd think that this were the 1950's again. Proving that once again, the left doesn't believe in the things they champion unless you agree totally with them. If you don't tow party line, you really don't deserve the rights they supposedly stand for.
And if Palin had a D behind her name, I wonder if we'd even know her kids' names. I barely know anything at all about Obama's girls except that if they made a mistake of having sex, he doesn't want them "punished with a baby".
Groups like the National Organization for Women only care about abortion. They're not truly about women, they're about worldview....and it better be liberal. Palin is for things that would benefit everyone, including women, regardless of worldview. When she supports plans that would lower the cost of fuel, it means it costs the soccer mom less to drive the kids to practice. When she supports tax cuts or school choice, she gives moms options to maybe be able to afford better schools for their kids. Lower taxes mean the working single mother may have more money for day care.
Sarah Palin, like many who don't believe in abortion, doesn't feel that complete and utter reproductive equality between men and women is worth the lives of the unborn. That's what the abortion issue is to organizations like NOW. It's about being equal to men in every way including reproductively speaking. A woman's particular biology is an inconvenient hurdle in the quest for absolute and total equality to men and they're convinced something must be done to remove that hurdle. After all, the man can have a one night stand and move on with nary a thought, while the woman is saddled with an unwanted pregnancy. This cannot stand and if the baby needs to die to protect the woman from this "punishment" then so be it.
