Amnesty attacks US over abuses

This is a forum for all off topic posts.
Post Reply
User avatar
NickD
Beholder
Posts: 1969
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:38 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Post by NickD »

Nekulor wrote:I don't think we should provide welfare, I think people should work to earn their money. The disabled, yes. John Doe Doesnothing, no. I can support temporary support programs for those that need it (6-8 months) but I don't condone them living off it. I don't see why I should have to support people with my hard earned money when they are essentially a bane upon society, contributing little to nothing to the overall nation or economy. Yes, it is a dark, angry and cold way to look at it, but I look at overall efficiancy and reducing government spending, not from the humanitarian point of view. I think charity should support the needy, like it always has. More charity, less forced donations to the poor.
Personally, I prefer paying welfare to people than having homeless people on the streets hassling me for money.

And you hate giving your money to people who can't (or won't) find work, but you're all for the $1trillion dollars spent on a war invading a country that was never ever going to present a threat to you?

Perhaps you better stop and think some time. :shock:
Current PCs:
NWN1: Soppi Widenbottle, High Priestess of Yondalla.
NWN2: Gruuhilda, Tree Hugging Half-Orc
User avatar
sgould72
Dire Badger
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Contact:

Post by sgould72 »

Perhaps you better stop and think some time.


The very notion is considered sacreligious amongst the conservatives over here. There are probably a few around that would like to torture you for suggesting such a thing.
Current PC - Glarin Goldseeker
User avatar
NESchampion
Staff Head - Documentation
Posts: 884
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:46 am

Post by NESchampion »

Nekulor wrote:I don't see why I should have to support people with my hard earned money when they are essentially a bane upon society, contributing little to nothing to the overall nation or economy. Yes, it is a dark, angry and cold way to look at it, but I look at overall efficiancy and reducing government spending, not from the humanitarian point of view.
I know that you said except for the disabled, but they're a huge drain on our society, worse even than Joe DoNothing, because he still has the potential to contribute to society, as I'm sure you'll agree. If you're really interested in improving our societal efficiency and reducing government spending, we should get rid of money holes, like disabled peoples. We could shoot them all, but bullets and guns cost money and are messy....I know, how about gassing them! But where to do it... we'd have to build some sort of camps, wherein we could concentrate them together....

I hope you see where this is going. Humanitarian point of view is extremely important when you consider public works programs. Otherwise, you're just indirectly responsible for the decline of society by cutting the funding for such programs beyond sensible means.
Current PC: Olaf - The Silver Marches
User avatar
NickD
Beholder
Posts: 1969
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:38 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Post by NickD »

NESchampion wrote:I know that you said except for the disabled, but they're a huge drain on our society, worse even than Joe DoNothing, because he still has the potential to contribute to society, as I'm sure you'll agree. If you're really interested in improving our societal efficiency and reducing government spending, we should get rid of money holes, like disabled peoples. We could shoot them all, but bullets and guns cost money and are messy....I know, how about gassing them! But where to do it... we'd have to build some sort of camps, wherein we could concentrate them together....
That would be inhumane! You should just steralise everyone with a physical or mental disability so they're incapable of breeding more drains on society!
Current PCs:
NWN1: Soppi Widenbottle, High Priestess of Yondalla.
NWN2: Gruuhilda, Tree Hugging Half-Orc
User avatar
Joos
Frost Giant
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 8:05 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz

Post by Joos »

NickD wrote:
NESchampion wrote:I know that you said except for the disabled, but they're a huge drain on our society, worse even than Joe DoNothing, because he still has the potential to contribute to society, as I'm sure you'll agree. If you're really interested in improving our societal efficiency and reducing government spending, we should get rid of money holes, like disabled peoples. We could shoot them all, but bullets and guns cost money and are messy....I know, how about gassing them! But where to do it... we'd have to build some sort of camps, wherein we could concentrate them together....
That would be inhumane! You should just steralise everyone with a physical or mental disability so they're incapable of breeding more drains on society!
Sorry, done that and it doesnt really work. Murder-camps for all who doesn't fit the bill is the only sollution. This could be a good source for organ donations and skin for closthing! Finally the poor animals don't have to suffer and all the useless people can finally do some good be giving us good people the good organs we need.
User avatar
Nekulor
Gelatinous Cube
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: (GMT-4) Ninja Training School
Contact:

Post by Nekulor »

I feel like things in my last post were taken a little out of proportion. I'm not condoning the mass slaughter of the dregs of society, I'm mostly just saying that I don't want to support their lazy asses.
I voted for Obama. The apocalypse is nigh!
paazin
Fionn In Disguise
Posts: 3544
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 1:07 am
Location: UTC +2
Contact:

Post by paazin »

Nekulor wrote:I'm not condoning the mass slaughter of the dregs of society
Indeed, because it'd be absolutely foolish to destroy your own production base. If you slaughter all your subjects, what is the point of even having power?
People talk of bestial cruelty, but that's a great injustice and insult to the beasts; a beast can never be so cruel as man, so artistically cruel.
MorbidKate
Dungeon Master
Posts: 1627
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: GMT -5 (EST)

Post by MorbidKate »

Joos wrote:Sorry, done that and it doesnt really work. Murder-camps for all who doesn't fit the bill is the only sollution. This could be a good source for organ donations and skin for closthing! Finally the poor animals don't have to suffer and all the useless people can finally do some good be giving us good people the good organs we need.
Joos, you forgot that these people are also a good source of material in the production of lamp shades. ;)

What I find stunning in threads of this ilk is how oblivious some people are that the views and beliefs they proudly pound their fists about have already been covered over and over again. For those that are seemingly unaware that history tends to repeat itself I suggest reading something like Mein Kampf as a quick refresher:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mein_Kampf
"We had gone in search of the American dream. It had been a lame f*ckaround. A waste of time. There was no point in looking back. F*ck no, not today thank you kindly. My heart was filled with joy. I felt like a monster reincarnation of Horatio Alger. A man on the move... and just sick enough to be totally confident." -- Raoul Duke.
User avatar
Nekulor
Gelatinous Cube
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: (GMT-4) Ninja Training School
Contact:

Post by Nekulor »

I'm simply saying, I don't want to support the lower levels of society, nor do I feel the need to. They can support themselves. If I'm capable of success, and they aren't dead or disabled, then they should also be capable of it. However, certain niches ultimately need to be fulfilled in every society, and certain people are just going to be poor. We can't all be rich and successful, because it would undermine the fundamental values of an economic system. If you want to argue that there are not fundamental niches in each society, then you truly failed to pay attention in sociology and economics, because even in the totally "equal" communism, there is a disparity in power.

The only "remedy" to this is communism, and I'd die before I see this country EVER take that bane upon the world that is communism as an economic strategy. Communism encourages laziness and lack of work ethic. People should be rewarded for hard work. A rocket scientist should not be paid the same as a garbage disposal worker.

Now back on topic. To clarify my view on torture in a few points:
1.) Torture is bad. I never said it was great, good or fun. Torture is evil.
2.) Torture is, in extreme cases, a necessary evil. In the event that public safety and human rights come in conflict, I go with the general good every time.
3.) Gitmo needs to be overhauled. So do many of our other prison facilities.
4.) Ultimately, I do not care about the well being of foreign insurgents. They give me no reason to care about them. They hate me, they want me dead, and they will blow themselves up to see that happen. They spit on my nation's flag, they burn my nation's flag, and I've had it up to here with international peace organizations telling us we need to play nice with these people! They throw Geneva in our faces weekly, but they don't do it to other nations.
5.)I've lost faith in the current administration. Rudy Giuliani in 2008. Either him or Fred Thompson. Both are moderate conservatives. The current administration panders to big buisness and spends like a bunch of liberals. We need true domestic, economic and foreign policy conservatives or a very moderate democrat to fix the mess Bush will leave us with.
I voted for Obama. The apocalypse is nigh!
User avatar
Rotku
Iron Fist Tyrant
Posts: 6948
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand (+13 GMT)

Post by Rotku »

If you want to argue that there are not fundamental niches in each society, then you truly failed to pay attention in sociology and economics, because even in the totally "equal" communism, there is a disparity in power.
Oh?
< Signature Free Zone >
User avatar
psycho_leo
Rust Monster
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:10 am
Location: Brazil

Post by psycho_leo »

Nekulor wrote: 2.) Torture is, in extreme cases, a necessary evil. In the event that public safety and human rights come in conflict, I go with the general good every time.
If you think torture is useful you've been watching too many movies. Anyone confesses their crimes under toture. Hell I'd confess to hide Bin Laden under my bed if taken to a prison for months and tortured without ever being charged with a crime.

The problem with torture as a method of acquiring information is that you'd tell anything to stop being tortured, even when you got nothing to say. Yes. Sometimes they get the wrong guy. Ever thought of that?
Current PC: Gareth Darkriver, errant knight of Kelemvor
Se'rie Arnimane: Time is of the essence!
Nawiel Di'malie: Shush! we're celebrating!
MorbidKate
Dungeon Master
Posts: 1627
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: GMT -5 (EST)

Post by MorbidKate »

Nekulor wrote:I'm simply saying, I don't want to support the lower levels of society, nor do I feel the need to. They can support themselves. If I'm capable of success, and they aren't dead or disabled, then they should also be capable of it. However, certain niches ultimately need to be fulfilled in every society, and certain people are just going to be poor.


I never realized being poor was a niche market :?

You make it sound like someone would actually choose to be poor when in fact circumstance plays the greatest role. Heck, anybody can be homeless in a hurry if circumstance caused them to miss just a couple of mortgage payments. People born below the poverty line tend to stay below it and kids born into wealthy families tend to stay above it.
We can't all be rich and successful, because it would undermine the fundamental values of an economic system. If you want to argue that there are not fundamental niches in each society, then you truly failed to pay attention in sociology and economics, because even in the totally "equal" communism, there is a disparity in power.
Your point is what? What you’re talking about is relativity, that's all. What's considered poor in one country is considered rich in another though your previous posts suggest poor people are that way because their just lazy or something and need to be dealt with.
The only "remedy" to this is communism, and I'd die before I see this country EVER take that bane upon the world that is communism as an economic strategy. Communism encourages laziness and lack of work ethic. People should be rewarded for hard work. A rocket scientist should not be paid the same as a garbage disposal worker.
Funny. I've heard many white collar people see Unions in the same light. Besides, Communism only ever worked on paper because it never took into account human desire to improve quality of life.
Now back on topic. To clarify my view on torture in a few points:

1.) Torture is bad. I never said it was great, good or fun. Torture is evil.
Torture is also illegal. Re-defining what "Torture" is doesn't change that and re-naming captives under another name to deny basic human rights is the kind of stuff the US once fought against.
2.) Torture is, in extreme cases, a necessary evil. In the event that public safety and human rights come in conflict, I go with the general good every time.
Utter bullshit. Stop watching 24 and go talk to someone who's taken Escape and Evasion classes. Sleep deprivation and stress positions will usually break someone in 72 hours or less and even then, most if not all the intel gleaned will be whatever the interrogators’ want to hear, just to end it. Now think of the thousands of "captives" in the US network of secret prisons conveniently located in ex-Warsaw Pact countries that have been tortured for years now. Think any of it is "actionable intelligence"??
3.) Gitmo needs to be overhauled. So do many of our other prison facilities.
They need to be closed because the PR damage the US is doing to itself far outweigh any gains.
4.) Ultimately, I do not care about the well being of foreign insurgents. They give me no reason to care about them. They hate me, they want me dead, and they will blow themselves up to see that happen. They spit on my nation's flag, they burn my nation's flag, and I've had it up to here with international peace organizations telling us we need to play nice with these people! They throw Geneva in our faces weekly, but they don't do it to other nations.
You seem to believe that everyone gathered up and placed in these prisons actually deserve to be there. Fact is, most are there because the US pays good money for anyone handed over and rivals get each other picked up to gain power. The Washington Post had a great article on the "market" for insurgents last year.
5.)I've lost faith in the current administration. Rudy Giuliani in 2008. Either him or Fred Thompson. Both are moderate conservatives. The current administration panders to big buisness and spends like a bunch of liberals. We need true domestic, economic and foreign policy conservatives or a very moderate democrat to fix the mess Bush will leave us with.
That mess is going to haunt the US for at least a generation. Besides, Giuliani doesn't stand a chance. Michael Bloomberg is the Republicans best chance so I expect him to run, mainly because the other options are laughable.

Kate
"We had gone in search of the American dream. It had been a lame f*ckaround. A waste of time. There was no point in looking back. F*ck no, not today thank you kindly. My heart was filled with joy. I felt like a monster reincarnation of Horatio Alger. A man on the move... and just sick enough to be totally confident." -- Raoul Duke.
Veilan
Lead Admin
Posts: 6152
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: UTC+1
Contact:

Post by Veilan »

Nekulor wrote:4.) Ultimately, I do not care about the well being of foreign insurgents.
MorbidKate wrote:You seem to believe that everyone gathered up and placed in these prisons actually deserve to be there.
Just for clarity's sake, as I believe there's a lot of arguing past the other in the whole thread:

He doesn't.

To my reading, he never claimed everyone in Gitmo was a foreign insurgent.
The power of concealment lies in revelation.
User avatar
Mulu
Mental Welfare Queen
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:25 am

Post by Mulu »

Kate made all the points I was going to make. However, I'm sure at least one will not be understood, so I'll make it plain.

Detainees are mostly innocent people. This is how it works: A bomb goes off. Our soldiers round up any nearby Sunni males and question them using Shia translators who purposefully mistranslate their statements to make them sound guilty. Those men then get bagged and go into detention, where they are tortured until they "name names" of people in the insurgency. Those names might be personal enemies, or simply acquaintences, but they typically aren't insurgents. Those people get rounded up and tortured until *they* "name names," and the process continues.

Every once in a while they actually bag an insurgent, though even then it's usually just some expendable unemployed guy working as a fighter for the insurgency to try to feed his family (unemployment is at 60% and the insurgency is one of the few employers of Sunni in Iraq), but in the meantime they are detaining and torturing *thousands* of innocent civilians. The situation on the ground is constantly changing, making any operational intel a detainee might have outdated within weeks, yet we detain and question them for years. We have over 10,000 people in detention in Bagdhad, including women and children. And for some strange reason, despite these brilliant tactics, the insurgency only grows worse, and more popular among Iraqi civilians.

Torture doesn't work, and it's illegal. Worse still is the PR blowback from using it. For some reason, most of the rest of the world sees the US as being a lot more evil than they used to. Funny that.
Neverwinter Connections Dungeon Master since 2002! :D
Click for the best roleplaying!

On NWVault by me:
X-INV, X-COM, War of the Worlds, Lantan University.
MorbidKate
Dungeon Master
Posts: 1627
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: GMT -5 (EST)

Post by MorbidKate »

Alara wrote:
Nekulor wrote:4.) Ultimately, I do not care about the well being of foreign insurgents.
MorbidKate wrote:You seem to believe that everyone gathered up and placed in these prisons actually deserve to be there.
Just for clarity's sake, as I believe there's a lot of arguing past the other in the whole thread:

He doesn't.

To my reading, he never claimed everyone in Gitmo was a foreign insurgent.
I based my comments on this:
Nekulor wrote:However, no argument from anyone is going to change my mind on the interrogation and torture of detainees. I don't care what the military does to or with them, as long as it never sees the light of day with the international media.


Pretty clear to me what he thinks, no matter if most were rounded up because of finger pointing in exchange for cash or pressure to protect their own families. Local or foreign, all the same to him.

Still it's important to note that the great majority of "insurgents" fighting the US in Iraq are actually Iraqi though the government would like the public to believe that it's foreign fighters creating all the problems.

Kate
"We had gone in search of the American dream. It had been a lame f*ckaround. A waste of time. There was no point in looking back. F*ck no, not today thank you kindly. My heart was filled with joy. I felt like a monster reincarnation of Horatio Alger. A man on the move... and just sick enough to be totally confident." -- Raoul Duke.
Post Reply