It wasn't Bush. Maybe if he was born to be king, but he wasn't. Maybe if he was clairvoyant he could anticipate what people do. There is no way to tell what a person can do until they rise up to the occasion. You can speculate upon their past ability but that's all. My only complaint is that Bush isn't a military leader. The inability to realize that america is departamentalized for a reason with decentralized mini governments governing over different aspects of the united states is a bit mind boggling Swift, but there it is. Forgive me if you are aware of this, it seems implied that you are not. "He lives and dies by the decisions his administration makes. If his administration does something stupid, he has to wear that." One world, One government, One people. Imgine, hope, change, believe it. The audacity of it, of what? Hope? Hope of what? Being Obama? According to you Bush wears the bullseye and the dead albatross. The Iraq war, it hangs upon his neck.Swift wrote:Just what is the american ideology exactly?HATEFACE wrote:That they have no rights because they don't follow the american idealogy & and have deeply rooted anti-american sentiment.
Except that the buck stops with him. He is the commander in chief, the leader of the country. He lives and dies by the decisions his administration makes. If his administration does something stupid, he has to wear that. If someone he has brought in makes a bad decision, it is every bit the presidents fault as it is theirs, especially when he backs them to the hilt despite their idiocy.People ask me, do I hate Bush for all he has done? No. I disagree with what specific people within the administration have done. it's one thing to create a scapegoat out of a president in order to curry political favor, is quite another to analyse a situation and place blame where it ought to be placed and correct the situation.
You cannot just wipe your hands and have all blame cast aside because "it wasnt me". Not when your the president. Not when your the public leader of any political party. It all comes back to them. In 100 years time, when they are teaching history, the kids aren't going to learn that in the early 21st century Dick Cheney the vice president sent America to war, it will be President Bush.
By your logic, Do you then blame Bill Clinton for the militant abduction of Elian Gonzalez? Not Attorney Janet Reno or Al Gore?
Or do you not blame anyone at all? Perhaps not with your neat albiet not unique way of thinking and processing information.
Just a little heads up on how Elian is doing now. He's all grown up and once wore a Young Pioneer uniform of Cuba's Communist youth league. I think it's a baseball team in cuba, right? Must of been from all those wonderful childhood nightmares of having a Mp5 pointed at his little noggin. Furthering the left agenda and anti-american sentiement? Check.
"Al Gore's [26] handling of the matter may have been as great a factor as anger by the predominantly Republican Cuban community over the boy's return to Cuba. Gore initially supported Republican legislation to give the boy and his father permanent residence status, but later supported the Administration position."
But that is understandable with socialists siding with socialists. Forget bipartisanship.
Understand that if Bush was getting information from incorrect individuals, he too, would be incorrect. Does that make him responsible? No, it doesn't. It makes people who were wrong about aspects of the Iraq war responsible. Bush has apologized, same with then secretary Rumsfeld but that wasn't enough for adopted & capilized political populsim of democrats to fall in line and support a war weary population to convert them toward a sense of hate for conservatism. - Not to mention! The very fact that there are now crazy individuals who would side with terrorism. Osama Bin Ladin =! George W. Bush. Saddam Hussien =! George W. Bush. I hope that clears some things up.
Petraeus is doing a wonderful job thus far. John McCain is a military man and will no doubt have a sense of urgency about letting terrorism foster and America doesn't need this.
Sorry that I disabled your scapegoatism. Just because you're the president doesn't mean you always speak for everyone. In fact, as president you should know you can't please everyone but you can try to make a difference for the country and people you serve. Often times it requires doing the right thing whether it is popular or not. History has shown that often, presidents will cave to pressure and not do the right thing when its required of them. I believe president Bush has done the right thing, including listening to McCain about the surge. We will have bases in Iraq for a long time after this. Once it is stable, it will become a great place to visit, and history will show that maybe splitting the country up wasn't such a great idea after all and even Iraqis, being human, can still work together toward peace. - You're the one who started the speculation.
Then the kids will grow up, get out of grade school, hopefully go to college, and learn a thing or two. Unless they were like my political teachers who view republicanism as a great scourge upon the planet or some such nonsense. It's enough that I pass their class and learn something not regard them as the absolute authority. Doing so, limits a person.
Oh, and for the record, I credit Bush for faith based initiatives and charities. There, you can use that.
I would like to hear it from a democrats point of view actually.Just what is the american ideology exactly?