Only a handful would have known it was a lie, perhaps only one, the guy who made up the story in the first place.Vaelahr earlier wrote:Thousands of people do not die for what they know to be a lie.
And I earlier refuted this. You could say the same thing about Al Qaida, the insurgents in Iraq, etc. Their members have faced tremendous adversity. Being willing to die for a belief does not make that belief truthful. There is also the possibility, perhaps I should high liklihood, that they believed their own lie. I've met people who are convinced they've seen angels. I call them whack jobs, though I believe the technical term is "deluded."Vaelahr earlier wrote:Furthermore, there was no motive for such a lie. Lies are always told for some selfish advantage. What advantage did the "conspirators" derive from their "lie" ? They were scorned, imprisoned, enslaved, tortured, exiled, crucified, boiled alive, burned alive, beheaded, disemboweled, and/or fed to lions in the Colosseum.....hardly a list of perks.
It's hard to produce the body of a fictional character. Even if he had been real, theft of that body would have eliminated the only evidence the story of Resurrection was a fraud. This is all starting to sound like UFO conspiracy theory.Vaelahr earlier wrote:If there had been a conspiracy, it would have been revealed by the faith's many enemies who had both the interest and the power to expose any fraud.
Again, the martys of Islam fall into the same category.Vaelahr wrote:The disciples had nothing to gain by fabricating a story and starting a new religion. His followers faced hardship, ridicule, hostility, and martyrs' deaths. In light of this, they could never have sustained such unwavering motivation if they knew what they were preaching was a lie.
I don't understand why the Romans would have tried to cover up a supernatural event. Ancient peoples were even more superstitious than modern people, and the Romans were willing to pray to any and all gods. Seeing actual supernatural events would have a profound impact on them. They wouldn't simply run away into obscurity, and their leaders would have been very interested in such events. It would have likely called for mass sacrifices.Vaelahr wrote:They did. And I'm sure it did merit a report; one that would've resulted in their deaths. Which explains why they fled as the Gospel records reveal. What ever became of them, we do not know. Probably exile, if they weren't captured and punished.Mulu wrote:Had a Roman guard seen angels in the empty tomb of some executed Jew, don't you think that would have merited a report? After all, if Jesus rose from the dead and rolled back the stone covering his tomb, wouldn't the Roman guard have noticed?
But at this point, we're no longer even discussing possibilities. At the point where you are debating the actual effect of an appearance of angels on ancient guards, you may as well be talking about whether Heracles was visited by two nymphs - Pleasure and Virtue - who offered him a choice between a pleasant and easy life or a severe but glorious life. This is just one irrational myth among thousands, all of which have equal validity to an outside observer (namely, zero). It's all mumbo jumbo.