shad0wfax DMA platform
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:24 am
1) I will continue to support HDMs.
2) I will continue to support DMs.
3) I will continue to proactively resolve conflicts within the DMA domain.
My history on these matters speaks for itself and below are the actions that I have taken to support the above.
1) Support HDMS. Appoint HDMs who are active and desire to perform the role.
Actions taken to accomplish this:
a) When I no longer had the time to HDM BG, I appointed Ariana to do so, in addition to MS, and she has been active on both servers.
b) Appointed Wynna to HDM on TSM
c) Added the following DMs:
2) Support new DMs:
Actions taken to accomplish this:
2014-05-20 Kiyoti added as DM
2014-06-10 Ronan returns as DM/EADM
2014-07-09 Lokan added as BGDM: welcome aboard.
2014-12-09 HEEGZ resumes BGDM
2015-01-13 Rumple C joins BGDM
2015-05-29 Mick added as BGDM: welcome aboard.
2105-05-05 HEEGZ returns BGDM.
2015-05-28 kid returns BGDM.
2015-07-15 johnlewismcleod added as BG DM {global DM]
2015-07-28 Lokan listed as active.
2015-11-20 Lokan, kid, and johnlewismcleod listed as inactive.
2016-06-11 TwinAxes becomes BG DM.
2016-12-05 HEEGZ appointed HDM.
2017-06-30 Stormbringer added as DM.
2018-01-07 List pruned. Arianna added as HDM for a few months.
2018-02-05 orangetree DM
2019-10-01 paazin DM
2019-12-23 "A few months" became indefinitely for Ariana
202-04-10 Duck One DM
3) Resolve conflicts within the DMA domain.
Actions taken to support this:
a) A single conflict occurred between a player (who has since been made a DM) and a HDM. The conflict was due to the player and the HDM not communicating clearly. I mediated the conflict between the player (now DM) and the HDM. Both the player and the HDM were mutually satisfied with the outcome.
b) The opposing candidate requested that I "step down" from the role of DMA. I asked what the compelling need for me to vacate the office was. The response I received was,
2) I will continue to support DMs.
3) I will continue to proactively resolve conflicts within the DMA domain.
My history on these matters speaks for itself and below are the actions that I have taken to support the above.
1) Support HDMS. Appoint HDMs who are active and desire to perform the role.
Actions taken to accomplish this:
a) When I no longer had the time to HDM BG, I appointed Ariana to do so, in addition to MS, and she has been active on both servers.
b) Appointed Wynna to HDM on TSM
c) Added the following DMs:
2) Support new DMs:
Actions taken to accomplish this:
2014-05-20 Kiyoti added as DM
2014-06-10 Ronan returns as DM/EADM
2014-07-09 Lokan added as BGDM: welcome aboard.
2014-12-09 HEEGZ resumes BGDM
2015-01-13 Rumple C joins BGDM
2015-05-29 Mick added as BGDM: welcome aboard.
2105-05-05 HEEGZ returns BGDM.
2015-05-28 kid returns BGDM.
2015-07-15 johnlewismcleod added as BG DM {global DM]
2015-07-28 Lokan listed as active.
2015-11-20 Lokan, kid, and johnlewismcleod listed as inactive.
2016-06-11 TwinAxes becomes BG DM.
2016-12-05 HEEGZ appointed HDM.
2017-06-30 Stormbringer added as DM.
2018-01-07 List pruned. Arianna added as HDM for a few months.
2018-02-05 orangetree DM
2019-10-01 paazin DM
2019-12-23 "A few months" became indefinitely for Ariana
202-04-10 Duck One DM
3) Resolve conflicts within the DMA domain.
Actions taken to support this:
a) A single conflict occurred between a player (who has since been made a DM) and a HDM. The conflict was due to the player and the HDM not communicating clearly. I mediated the conflict between the player (now DM) and the HDM. Both the player and the HDM were mutually satisfied with the outcome.
b) The opposing candidate requested that I "step down" from the role of DMA. I asked what the compelling need for me to vacate the office was. The response I received was,
As the role of DMA is "Oversight of DMs & Servers including Item Compliance, Global Plots & Quests, DM Approval & Discipline, among others" I proactively contacted the DM team staff to determine if there were any active problems requiring resolution which I was unaware of, as a player, not a DM, brought the above concern to me. A single DM had a problem with the way elections are being handled, which is LA domain, not DMA domain. With no problems or concerns (other than elections) voiced applicable to the DMA domain, there are no conflicts to resolve.A simple yes or no would do. Anything else will probably not lead to a productive discussion. [...] I don’t particularly want to inflame the situation and the reasons probably will.