AnalogKid's DMA Platform

[Analogkid]

We can stick with the status quo, or we can try and make some changes. I'm not a DM, but have played one at times.

My platform is simple.

1. Allow alternate PC's.

2. Allow a test run of opening up a server, to everyone who plays NWN2. This will allow us to decide on whether to move ahead with opening up every ALFA server, keeping it limited in some form or abandoning the idea if it proves contrary to our standards of RP.

3. Bring democracy to ALFA. This shouldn't be place of cliques and insular bands of people, to that end I believe we need to review how we handle elections and how we handle the specific jobs within ALFA. It's not healthy that only a small, nearly perpetually re-elected band keeps hold on power...and at times the knowledge needed to wield that power. We need to shake things up here, but not just for the sake of chaos or havoc. We need to save ALFA.

[Rumple C]

Interesting platform.

Do you see election changes as being part of the scope of the DMA authority?

What are the benefits of multiple pcs? What measures would you put in place to prevent abuse of such? How many pcs would be allowed?

For what it is worth I do agree that we need to find a way to bring new blood into ALFA and combat attrition.

[Analogkid]

Interesting platform.

Do you see election changes as being part of the scope of the DMA authority?

A couple of points. DM oversight not only means watching out and making sure DMs don't go do anything shady. To me it also entails being proactive and making sure we have a strong and vibrant community for our DMs. To that end, I see election reform, as an issue that affects and touches all of admin and alfa players. At the minimum, I would be a voice for reform amongst admin and press for a debate on the matter.

What are the benefits of multiple pcs?

Players will have more freedom to try out different PC concepts. Odds are we would see a flourishing of PC types that we don't see much of. There will be a larger spread of PCs throughout the servers.

We all complain about not being able to get into DM plots/sessions on other servers, and some times the DM will be unwilling to include the level 9 ne'er do well into the session aimed at level 1-2 lowbies. This solves that problem. DMs will have more freedom to come up with specific level based plots and sessions since if there is interest, alts could be rolled up for the session.

Gets rid of the stress of dealing with old established PCs, for those players who feel in a rut but don't feel like retiring, multiple pcs is the answer.

What measures would you put in place to prevent abuse of such?

Preventative measures I would support would be discouraging your PCs from being active on the same server. This would also give an option of greater freedom of travel for PCs who do not role up multiple PCs. Obviously, there will be a need to keep track of where PCs are based at. Given DM approval and some time delay, switching PCs between servers could be allowed.

How many pcs would be allowed?

I would like to see up to three PCs allowed per player, and keep the current system we have in place of retiring.

[Rotku]

What sort of electoral reforms are you thinking?

Where do you stand on putting in a formalised complaint/review system for the DMs, like the PA currently has for player complaints?

Where do you stand on new servers? Are they a good thing, as a big draw point of ALFA (explore the realms, and all that)? Or are they not so good, due to player density? Do you feel strongly enough either way to take action on the issue?

[trentfrompunchy83]

Your platform sounds like a burst of fresh air. Thanks for running.

What will you do to insure that DM's are supported in what they do and dont suffer burnout*?

My reason for asking is purely selfish. The two DM's that took active (positive)interest in my character seem to have vanished and hence combined with real life and timezones my game has become stagnant to non existant.

* My perception of burnout is not a DM biting off more than they can chew, usually a DM likes what they do and more to like is more fun right? I look at burnout as suffering at the hands of needy, whiney, complaining ungrateful dick players or jerk attitude admins.

[Analogkid]

What sort of electoral reforms are you thinking?

I think we can head into the direction where elections for the various posts are held at the same time, and those elected serve for a year. If someone wishes to step down, gets recalled, vanishes then a snap election is called to fill out the remainder of the term.

Where do you stand on putting in a formalised complaint/review system for the DMs, like the PA currently has for player complaints?

I support the idea

Where do you stand on new servers? Are they a good thing, as a big draw point of ALFA (explore the realms, and all that)? Or are they not so good, due to player density? Do you feel strongly enough either way to take action on the issue?

If we make the other changes I have stated in my platform. Then increasing the number of servers is a GREAT thing. It will and should remain a draw of ALFA that we aim to recreate the realms. So yes, I would actively support new servers

[Analogkid]

Your platform sounds like a burst of fresh air. Thanks for running.

What will you do to insure that DM's are supported in what they do and dont suffer burnout*?

DM's should be able to focus on DMing/Having fun. Speaking from my own DMing experience, you want to DM but then you have to deal with tech issues, complaints and of course real life, then theres the scheduling aspect.
I believe aspects of my platform would help in this it would lead to a larger playerbase and more spread throughout the servers. This in turn can push those on the fence about DMing to give it a try. The hardest part for DMs is when they feel like they're alone and don't have someone to turn to for help. We need to have a system in a place where it's easier to move DMs around as needed if you ask me. We also need to simplify and speed up the red tape that DMs often have to deal with.

In regards to vanishing DMs that are managing ongoing plots. I know how frustrating that can be and definately would try to help deal with those kinds of situations. My hope would be to have a list of DMs who could be turned to serve as back ups. If all else fails and depending on the server, I likely would try to step in depending on the circumstances.

[Rotku]

So how do you see yourself differing from the other two?

[Analogkid]

So how do you see yourself differing from the other two?

I'll stick to my platform. Our goal shouldn't just be to muddle through and stick to what we know. We should at least give a shot to a concrete proposal for change. I'll not cease trying to implement my platform during my term, but at the same time i'll do what I can to help the entire DM team. My first order of business being a frank discussion with the entire DM team, both as a group and one on one to see where we all stand and what everyone is hoping for.
I can easily step in and DM on the various servers that I don't play on, generally as a last resort when DMs need help or a plot needs a finish. So that alone should help make a difference.

If elected and you don't like what I do, vote me out or recall me.

[Rotku]

So how do you see yourself differing from the other two?

I'll stick to my platform.

The thing is, #1 in your platform requires support of all other Admin (or at least Regas); #2 Curm currently supports and is actively working towards, from what little I understand; and #3 is also currently supported by both other candidates. I personally see #1 very unlikely as happening, and as that seems to be the main thing differentiating you from the others (besides personalities, etc), is there anything I'm missing? I guess I'm getting the feeling you're not convinced that you'd make a good DMA yourself (horrible sentence... sorry).

[Analogkid]

So how do you see yourself differing from the other two?

I'll stick to my platform.

The thing is, #1 in your platform requires support of all other Admin (or at least Regas); #2 Curm currently supports and is actively working towards, from what little I understand; and #3 is also currently supported by both other candidates. I personally see #1 very unlikely as happening, and as that seems to be the main thing differentiating you from the others (besides personalities, etc), is there anything I'm missing? I guess I'm getting the feeling you're not convinced that you'd make a good DMA yourself (horrible sentence... sorry).

Not sure where you're getting that feeling from given that I know I would improve things here if i'm given the chance. Then again, for some...theres no need to improve things, no need to change, no need to bring in more players.

[Castano]

I guess I'm getting the feeling you're not convinced that you'd make a good DMA yourself (horrible sentence... sorry).

That's quite spiteful. What is this the presidential elections?

[Rotku]

I guess I'm getting the feeling you're not convinced that you'd make a good DMA yourself (horrible sentence... sorry).

That's quite spiteful. What is this the presidential elections?

Spiteful? Not my intent. Sorry if it came off that way