Jayde's DMA Platform and Q&A

This is a general open discussion for all ALFA, Neverwinter Nights, and Dungeons & Dragons topics.

Moderator: ALFA Administrators

Mikayla
Valsharess of ALFA
Posts: 3707
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Qu'ellar Faen Tlabbar, Noble Room 7, Menzoberranzan, NorthUnderdark

Post by Mikayla »

I thought I was done, I really did, but then Jayde posted above and I feel ... well ... compelled to set the record straight.

Jayde:
The investigation did not end as a result of FI retiring that PC. Had there been something untoward going on, it would have been investigated as an inappropriate act. The retiring of the PC did not erase what 'may' have happened. The oversimplification of what she perceived to have happened does Mikayla no credit here.
I did not oversimplify - I read the AR thread. Wynna posted that FI’s new PC was first level and in the next post Idoru said that there was no more issue because of it. It does not get any plainer than that.

The chronology:
The seventh post in the Fanaticus Incendi AR thread is by Idoru asking for an AR to handle/investigate the case.

The eighth post in the Fanaticus Incendi AR thread is by Wynna stating that FI’s current toon is 1st level.

The ninth post in the FI AR thread, posted 17 minutes after Wynna’s post, is Idoru stating he guessed this issue is “sorted” then.

So, the record clearly shows that the case was never investigated because FI retired her PC.

The fact is, I trust FI – if she was twinked back then by Jayde, I think she probably just didn’t know better – and it was a different time in ALFA. I personally think FI is a great PA and I’ve told her so in a PM a week or two ago.

You know, its weird, I don’t know why I feel compelled to discuss Jayde’s lack of integrity publically – when Rusty was accusing me of being a liar, I did not defend myself in the public forums because I was told I would receive a strike for doing so – and I wanted to follow the rules. I know by discussing the details of the AR thread above, I may receive a strike (and I suppose Jayde might too since his post contains very detailed information from that thread) – why would I take a strike to discuss Jayde but not to defend myself? I don’t really know. But, I feel compelled to do it.

Maybe my morality is completely out of step with ALFA – in ALFA, maybe I am up on a high-horse, or acting like superior kitteh, or as Helios' latest pic says, "acting High and Mighty" – but integrity is important to me. I realize there are those who think I am a liar, or who find it convenient to call me a liar, because of Rusty’s complaint against me – but I’ve never knowingly lied to any ALFAn ever – its not to say I’ve never lied, I just never have in ALFA.

That said – this issue has highlighted something for me – I think I am out of touch or out of step with ALFA – I don’t think ALFA thinks like I do, or holds the same values I do. So, whether I am on a "high horse" or acting "superior" or being "high and mighty" I am going to ‘step off’ to use the vernacular. I raised an issue, which to me is of great importance, but its fallen on hostile ears – so, it falls to me to recognize that the community holds different values than I do. So, its not the community that needs to change – its me – I either have to accept ALFA the way it is, or leave. So, I am taking a break or ‘stepping off’ as I have said. People like Helios can send their "superior kitteh", "high horse", "high n might", "epic fail" etc. pics to my PM box. I've gotten a kick out of the ones so far (especially TTs custom creations).

Ciao.
ALFA1-NWN1: Sheyreiza Valakahsa
NWN2: Layla (aka Aliyah, Amira, Snake and others) and Vellya
NWN1-WD: Shein'n Valakasha
User avatar
JaydeMoon
Fionn In Disguise
Posts: 3164
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 11:03 pm
Location: Paradise
Contact:

Post by JaydeMoon »

I think you should pick at one small part of my post, the part that you feel you can make a statement on, and disregard the entire rest of the post and what it had to say. That's fine and lovely. Par for the course ;)

Regardless, someone did speak to me about the issue at the time and I did give my statement.

Because, you see, beyond the issue that perhaps a PC had 'twink' beyond their level, which was indeed resolved by the PC simply having retired, there was the issue that potentially a DM was acting inappropriately by 'twinking' his friends. And while the issue of some great trinket on a 5th level character went away when that character and trinket disappeared, the perceived issue of how that trinket got to be in the hands of that character did not go away.

And I was called to account. And my accounting was, apparently, satisfactory, and was, in fact, the accounting I gave above. However, this is probably just a fabrication of mine, if you are willing to go so far as to make that direct accusation. However, despite your seeming belief that you are, you are not omniscient, and not everything that happens in ALFA happens with your knowledge and/or consent.

Now, if you have a question for me, then I welcome you to ask it, but if you have anything else to say regarding the issues that you are 'done' talking about, then might I suggest you use the thread you created specifically for that purpose?

Thank you.
<Burt>: two dudes are better than one.

DMG v.3.5 p.6, 8, and 14

BEATZ
User avatar
zicada
Infrastructure Prawn
Posts: 7924
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2002 10:00 pm
Location: Earth

Post by zicada »

JaydeMoon wrote:Thank you, Avaz :)

Below, I'd like to address something brought up in the other thread, and by extension lewt generation and standards:
NickD wrote:I'm kind of with Mikayla here. Sort of. My memory may be a bit off here, but I vaguely remember Jayde twinking FI when he was a DM and she was a player on WD. There was no charge and nothing was proven as such, but it was pretty blatant nonetheless. However, it was also quite a long time ago and he has since said that he has improved, which I think is fair enough.

At this point, I think Jayde is probably our best option. Even if a bit of favouritism happens behind the scenes between himself and FI, our other options include someone who is apparently running as a joke, someone who was DMA before had some sort of nervous breakdown, abused an entire server and quit and one of ALFA's biggest powergamers, who shouts and screams and throws tantrums whenever someone tries to punish him.

Eh.
Mikayla wrote:Your memory is not off. The investigation was just starting when FI's toon either died or was retired, thus mooting the investigation.
The investigation did not end as a result of FI retiring that PC. Had there been something untoward going on, it would have been investigated as an inappropriate act. The retiring of the PC did not erase what 'may' have happened. The oversimplification of what she perceived to have happened does Mikayla no credit here.

I'll start with a strange notion to put out there, considering everything else. It was Squams that said:
Squamatus wrote:Now before anyone starts crying about Jayde twinking a roommate or a buddy, please keep in mind that Jayde twinked everyone
While I wouldn't go so far as to say I was twinking anybody, somewhat supported by the fact that no one ever talked to me about giving items out to anybody (other than mutterings and forum flames), I did operate under an attitude that this was high fantasy adventure and I was more than willing to drop loot on my players. This attitude was not shared by most of the DM Corps, who mistakenly felt that we were a single PC, permadeath, low-wealth PW. Even with standards suggesting that it is alright to grant PCs a moderate level of wealth, DMs are still wary of giving anything out, as many players on TSM will tell you.

So yes, I felt no reason not to give out fun magic and gear.

To ALL of PCs involved in my campaigns, plots, and one-offs.

From my platform:
I can not express how important I feel the standards and training process is. I am a DM who enjoys rewarding PCs tangibly. There are some who will tell you that I have been heavy-handed about it in the past. They would not be wrong. I did not have a solid idea of the worth of certain items and effects, their intrinsic value.
So I actually already addressed this.


However, to the facts behind this particular incident:

Posted (rightfully so) by Rick90210 was a concern about gear he found on a character played by FI. It included a ring that blew Rick away.

Ring of Health
CSW (5) 2/day
CMW (3) 2/day
CLW (1) 2/day
Heal (11) 1 use only (after which the entire item crumbles to dust)

Now, njuberry of creating what amounts to a 5th level Cleric without actually having a cleric around aside...

The value of the ring was calculated (I think by AcadiusLost) as 34650. Standards of now would value it at 19598. That's a decrease of more than 40% of the original estimated worth. Suddenly it's a little less eye popping and more in the realm of jaw dropping :lol:

Now, onto the facts that were not revealed in the post, but that I discussed with an AR:

This item was a drop during time spent on Daggerford. It as during a dungeon crawl that involved SEVERAL players, ranging in level from 4-9. It involved lots of nasty critters. The ring was the most valuable drop.

I would like to note that the even the corrected value of the ring is outside current wealth standards for a 9th level PC. It is just outside the 'extreme' award level.

I did not know pricing at the time and especially did not understand 'secondary property penalties' and the like. I didn't think about how in adding more properties, the properties were more valuable because they came on the same slot as another property. It's something I totally understand now. The secondary properties were a full 3000 of that value. Not that it matters overmuch, but the non penalized value was well within the 'extreme' award value and a theoretically a justified drop if the CR of the encounter were high enough.

Now, my thought behind creating the ring was that somebody who was not a healer would be able to have and make use of the ring when they did not have a healer present, or their healer had exhausted healing magic.

It did not occur to me that such an item would be given to a healer.

I dropped the item near one of the higher level PCs as they searched the area.

It was picked up and identified. The person who had it determined that it might best go to the healer and thus gave it to FI's PC. I was not in the habit of blocking what I felt were actions taken IC.

In hindsight, maybe I should have. I should have said, "No, that's for you! Don't give it to anybody else."

The interesting thing about NickD bringing this up is that, when this fact that it was a drop that another PC picked up and that PC gave it to FI's PC came up, NickD came out of the peanut gallery (that is to say he was otherwise uninvolved with the whole discussion and was not a player or DM for the PC, or on the servers involved) and made a presumptuous statement when he said:
NickD wrote:Read: That member decided Lira should have it because Jayde told him that it was meant for her.
Without full view of the facts, operating solely with the information that A) FI's PC had the item and that B) It was said that another PC got the item first and gave it to FI's PC, NickD came to the conclusion that I must have specifically said to the PC that initially picked up the ring, "Hey, I know I dropped that where your character would pick it up, but really I need you to give that ring to FI." Because no other explanation is at all posible, given the circumstances, right? :roll:

---------

I would like to point out that even in the Wild West days of ALFA, while I was giving bags of loot out to everyone and their mother, and no one else seemed to be, every once in a while you'd run across a special item, or PCs with a grip of special items, kind of out of nowhere.

And during those days we had a 10K+ item thread. Supposedly all 10K + items were supposed to make it into that thread. However, they did not and at the beginning, because I did care about trying to get things right, I not only entered items I gave or that were commissioned (at the time it was considered that on WD if you could pay the price, you could get the item crafted, that changed after an incident involving a true seeing helm), I entered any items I found on any PCs. I did not actually differentiate, at the time, between items I gave or items I found, but the breakdown is thus:

Items I dropped or awarded: 4
Items commissioned on WD that I adjudicated: 4
Items I did not create but found on other PCs: 13

The first three pages are mostly me posting. In a time when no one else was really giving out any magic items, there I am recording 21 10K+ items. No wonder I was being seen as a lewt generating machine.

I stopped posting everything in the 10K+ thread after finding a 50K item on a level 9 PC. 50K is more than TWICE the 'extreme award' cut off value for an item given to a single PC. When I brought this up as potentially an issue, I was shouted down, told that the player's RP was impeccable, that only the Bracers (of Dex+5, 25K, yet another item outside the extreme award cutoff level for a level 9 PC) were really worth anything (the 50K item was Keen Rapier +2 +1d6 Divine), and to basically stfu.

Told a 50K item wasn't really worth that much, and one wonders why, in the days of my njubbery in regards to standards, I didn't think a ring that cast healing spells was really all that great an item?

Shortly thereafter I stopped posting in the 10K+ thread, considering the whole thing a farce that had sullied my reputation.

So anyway, items, I like seeing PCs have that special item that means a lot to their character's development and I love that we have standards in place to guide me to a path of balance and fairness.
O RLY ?
"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully." -- Richard Dawkins
User avatar
Phineus
Dire Badger
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:06 pm

Post by Phineus »

I really only have one question. Does this bloated bureaucracy allow me to vote for you or not?
ALFA2 Current PC: Kelvyn Gw'ynn
User avatar
psycho_leo
Rust Monster
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:10 am
Location: Brazil

Post by psycho_leo »

Phineus wrote:I really only have one question. Does this bloated bureaucracy allow me to vote for you or not?
The only members entitled to a vote in the DMA election are admin, HDMs, ADMs and staff-heads.
Current PC: Gareth Darkriver, errant knight of Kelemvor
Se'rie Arnimane: Time is of the essence!
Nawiel Di'malie: Shush! we're celebrating!
User avatar
Valdimir
Head Dungeon Master
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Middle of the Pacific

Post by Valdimir »

Jayde,

While I understand that living with the PA can be a benefit to resolving issues where you disagree, it can also be a powerful alliance on issues where you agree. In Mik's post, you implied that you like to follow the "spirit of the rules" vice the letter. As recently as this latest recall, FI has indicated that she believes passion can be more important than process. In a "post-Rusty" administration with a brand new Lead Admin who has been given an unofficial mandate to seek compromise, I think it is fair to ask the following:

1) What issues do you and the current PA see "eye-to-eye" on?
2) Would you work within the system as written or fast track decisions on these matters under the label of "progress"?

Cheers and thank you for your time.
Valdimir
Former Sembian HDM, Whitehorn and OAS ADM
Current PC: Some halfbreed journeyman...
Former PC: Yakuut, Barbarian of Damara, Gladiator of Westgate, Sergeant of Daggerford Militia
User avatar
JaydeMoon
Fionn In Disguise
Posts: 3164
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 11:03 pm
Location: Paradise
Contact:

Post by JaydeMoon »

1) What issues do you and the current PA see "eye-to-eye" on?
Well, what issues do we see eye to eye on... and also where do we have disagreements?

Both of us agree that the community has gotten bureaucentric, if you will. Both of us agree that NWN2 needs full support as the 'future' of ALFA. Both of us agree that NWN1 should not fall to the wayside. Both of us agree that the function of the seated Admin is to represent their constituency to the community.

What we haven't come to any agreement on is the best way to fix the issues the community has. We each have different ideas on how to support both platforms. However, no amount of discussion between just the two of us is going to net those answers. While hastened communication and an amiable relationship between the DMA and PA can be a boon, it isn't an insulated bubble. Input from the community and people smarter than us is key to any decision making.
2) Would you work within the system as written or fast track decisions on these matters under the label of "progress"?
Working within the system is important in order to create a sense of trust and faith in how decisions are made. While I feel that the 'spirit' of ALFA should trump any individual 'rule' we may come up with and I am a FIRM believer that the system is meant to serve the community, not the other way around, it is best to work within the guidelines wherever possible.

Even should FI and I (or any admin, for that matter) try to bowl over the community with crazy progressive changes and liberal thinking (GADZOOKS!), something to remember is that the power rests in the hands of all of the Admin and the HDMs as true decision makers for this community. Charter changes require majority Admin and 2/3 HDM vote. That means 3 of 5 Admin and 4 of 5 HDMs (since 3 of 5 is just shy of 2/3).

The power to remove seated admin also rests with that same body, being able to bring the ire of the constituency to bear against any Admin who is acting inappropriately in their position.

One thing that is KEY, in my mind, is regular communication with the HDMs. ALL of the HDMs. As I've said in previous elections, the position of the DMA is to serve the community, not be the boss os the DM Corps.

So keep in mind, if you vote for me, Vald... I'll be asking your (and all of the DM's) opinions on a lot. Because if the HDMs present a unified front on something, then agree or not, I will feel a responsibility to accept that stance as my own and present or defend it as passionately as if the idea were all mine.

To answer the question directly: I will always try to work within the system; leaving the system will be done when it is obvious, and the constituency agrees, that the system is not serving the community in that particular issue. I will never simply "fast-track" issues under any loose guise.
<Burt>: two dudes are better than one.

DMG v.3.5 p.6, 8, and 14

BEATZ
Post Reply