Curmudgeon's DMA platform and question thread

[Curmudgeon]

How significant a role do you feel past DMA decisions should play in the ALFA of the present? For example, HEEGZ (in my view) was reluctant to overturn previous decisions absent strong opposition from the DMs or players (e.g., the desire of some to return the Toughness feat to its ALFA1 general availability). How much of a limiting factor do you consider the precedents set by previous admins to be?

I feel very little inclination to revisit past DMA rulings unless there is a clear mandate from the active DM population or Standards to do so. ALFA is a project with a long history of discussion on the fine points of our operation, and unless something pertinent has changed substantially, I can see small need to rehash old debates. I don't think of this as limiting, more like maintaining continuity.

[Curmudgeon]

Will DMs and players notice any changes that affect them significantly should you become DMA?

I have no plan to institute quarterly performance reviews.