Aha, then may I present to you--
Current ACR bugs, organized by priority:
http://www.alandfaraway.org/forums/view ... 68&t=45559
Current requested ACR enhancements, currently under revision for organization:
http://www.alandfaraway.org/forums/view ... 97&t=45522
Except for the enhancements Ronan has requested. He wrote tickets for those and assigned them to himself. You may see the rebel's input here:
http://www.alandfaraway.org/support/support_acr
I've not put them on the central bug / enhancement thread because I'm counting Ronan's treatment as his taking responsibility (so we're not really looking for anyone to adopt, so they don't need to be on display).
Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
Moderator: ALFA Administrators
Re: Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
Why are you getting more questions than ronan?
Heero just pawn in game of life.
12.August.2013: Never forget.
15.December.2014: Never forget.
The Glorious 12.August.2015: Always Remember the Glorious 12th.
12.August.2013: Never forget.
15.December.2014: Never forget.
The Glorious 12.August.2015: Always Remember the Glorious 12th.
Re: Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
I'm not really sure that I am? Ronan pre-empted Rotku on re-asking questions (though I think there are two that were more directed at me than asking of me, and lol'd a little when Ronan answered 'em), and paazin said that his questions also apply to Ronan (but Ronan hasn't answered, so Paazin can't troll for clarification-- and Ronan's posts here are mostly a suggestion and then discussion where the two of us rambled on slightly-different topics until figuring out that we were... and OGR was just tryin' to be helpful). I think that's everyone who has asked questions-- now that you've asked us both this one.
Re: Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
I've got another question!
What do you think of this statement?Ronan wrote:I believe TA should be able to add any and all core 3.5 content into NWN. Admin may want to draw a circle around the allowed content, but they aren't going to draw that line though the PHB.
< Signature Free Zone >
Re: Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
Blargle. That's in my wall of text re: paazin, Question 2. In essence, "I also think that, but I think we need to sit down with all of our HDMs and overtly say 'These are the books that we can implement things from with only technical vetting to verify that it's a faithful implementation, these books over here we want to review content from on a change-by-change basis, and these books over here are so wildly unrelated to our game that using their content should require broad and impressive approval.' " -- it sounds like Ronan had something much more informal in mind for defining core books, and not much interest in the other stuff (which is fair; it'll be years before we can have the books that offer the baseline definition of our setting in play-- and I bet that if we really had the detailed conversation I'd like, we'd end up with something close to 28 books that are "core" content, with 9 of those being very rulebook-like)Rotku wrote:I've got another question!
What do you think of this statement?Ronan wrote:I believe TA should be able to add any and all core 3.5 content into NWN. Admin may want to draw a circle around the allowed content, but they aren't going to draw that line though the PHB.
Re: Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
Well...i did not want to ask anything as long that there was candidate running against you.
But due to the last "strange" events it seems you were left alone and going to win.
Personal issues and bad blood between us aside, here is something that troubles me...
You were a technical staff member and because of some error you had access to the PC bio forums for months. I will not say if you used this access for meta gaming or not (i'll let each one decide for himself), but i would like to know why you did not report it to anyone for such long period?
As technical person i would assume you knew you should not have access there as those are pure IC forums with no technical feedback requirements.
Perhaps you thought there was nothing wrong with it?
How would we know that as tech admin you would not use your access permissions to places you should not?
But due to the last "strange" events it seems you were left alone and going to win.
Personal issues and bad blood between us aside, here is something that troubles me...
You were a technical staff member and because of some error you had access to the PC bio forums for months. I will not say if you used this access for meta gaming or not (i'll let each one decide for himself), but i would like to know why you did not report it to anyone for such long period?
As technical person i would assume you knew you should not have access there as those are pure IC forums with no technical feedback requirements.
Perhaps you thought there was nothing wrong with it?
How would we know that as tech admin you would not use your access permissions to places you should not?
- Curmudgeon
- Gadfly
- Posts: 4312
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:07 am
- Location: East coast US
Re: Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
Rorax:
Zelknolf had access as a DM because I approved her for PDM status for Sand's NU Server project. End of story. Topic locked.
Contact me if you have further questions.
Zelknolf had access as a DM because I approved her for PDM status for Sand's NU Server project. End of story. Topic locked.
Contact me if you have further questions.
- Curmudgeon
HDM ALFA 03 - The Silver Marches
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Maxim #12: A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head." - The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries
"This is not my circus. These are not my monkeys."
Realmslore: Daily Dwarf Common
HDM ALFA 03 - The Silver Marches
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Maxim #12: A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head." - The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries
"This is not my circus. These are not my monkeys."
Realmslore: Daily Dwarf Common
- Blindhamsterman
- Haste Bear
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 11:13 am
- Location: GMT
Re: Zelknolf's TA Platform and Q&A
i can answer that for Zelk...
it wasn't technical error, Zelk was set to be a DM for Sands UD server which was in the works, a few others also had the same access.
i.e. there was no error, zelk was meant to have access, so why would zelk complain?
<edit>
Doh! NINJAD by the almighty Cthul... Curmudgeon!
it wasn't technical error, Zelk was set to be a DM for Sands UD server which was in the works, a few others also had the same access.
i.e. there was no error, zelk was meant to have access, so why would zelk complain?
<edit>
Doh! NINJAD by the almighty Cthul... Curmudgeon!
Standards Member
Current PC: Elenaril Avae'Kerym of the Lynx Lodge
Current PC: Elenaril Avae'Kerym of the Lynx Lodge
<Heero>: yeah for every pc ronan has killed dming, paazin has killed 2 with his spawns