Server Release: This way or that?

This is a general open discussion for all ALFA, Neverwinter Nights, and Dungeons & Dragons topics.

Moderator: ALFA Administrators

Which would you like to see?

Once approved, and standards have been passed, servers should be released when they are ready for live with no further stipulations
37
38%
Once approved, servers should be limited in number with the stated 3-5 guaranteed live servers and expansion servers to come later, if DM and player numbers bear expanding
29
30%
Once approved, 3-5 servers should be released for live and after those stabilize others can come online as they are ready
9
9%
Once approved, servers should be allowed to be built until numbers dictate applications should be closed
7
7%
Servers should be limited in number period
4
4%
After the 3-5 initial batch of live servers, a set number of servers should be released at certain timed intervals as they are ready (example: 2 servers every 3 months) Post alternative server number and time frame below
6
6%
I would rather watch sychronized swimming
4
4%
None of the above (explain below)
1
1%
 
Total votes: 97

User avatar
Rotku
Iron Fist Tyrant
Posts: 6948
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand (+13 GMT)

Post by Rotku »

Voersaa wrote:I pretty much agree with what you are saying Ronan.

IMO the idea of recreating the Faerun has shown to be unrealistic. And more or less every one here should have acknowledge that by now (unless they are living in a world of make believe). The only way that we may recover this fallen pillar is to consolidate and have a few but VERY active servers that will make ALFA as PW stand out. Once that is achieved and our numbers have grown substantially we can start to consider what to do next.
There are some goals that are never about achieving. They are aiming points. It is something that gives the community a direction to move in. If we did have an achievable end goal, it would get to a point that there would be no reason for improvement.

By saying that "we aim to recreate Faerun" does not mean "we will recreate Faerun". It is saying "we will recreate Faerun to the best of our abilities, while supporting the other pillars". Just because it is an unrealistic goal, does not make it an invalid one.
< Signature Free Zone >
User avatar
NickD
Beholder
Posts: 1969
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:38 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Post by NickD »

I wonder how many people are voting for the part of the first answer that says we should get the initial servers up and running as soon as they are ready, and how many are voting for the part of the first answer that implies we should have no restrictions on the number of servers to release or when to release them?

I think there are two completely different issues there which I believe may be clouding the poll.
Current PCs:
NWN1: Soppi Widenbottle, High Priestess of Yondalla.
NWN2: Gruuhilda, Tree Hugging Half-Orc
User avatar
Voersaa
Shambling Zombie
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 10:46 am
Location: Denmark

Post by Voersaa »

Ronan wrote:
Voersaa wrote:The only way that we may recover this fallen pillar is to consolidate and have a few but VERY active servers that will make ALFA as PW stand out.
Well, I was actually saying that we can have mostly inactive servers which do not have a detrimental effect on gameplay. We just need to keep the people looking for an ad-hoc game from logging into them and becoming disapointed.
Yeah but wouldn't that go against the entire idea of ALFA being made up of PW servers. You might speak of the pillars but in this case we would be forgetting what they support.
Suck FIST, vile demon! Er, well you WILL be sucking fists as soon as i can get past all theese damn tentacles to something that does the sucking... Oh dear lord, THAT'S not a tentacle!
Ronan
Dungeon Master
Posts: 4611
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 9:48 am

Post by Ronan »

Voersaa wrote:
Ronan wrote:
Voersaa wrote:The only way that we may recover this fallen pillar is to consolidate and have a few but VERY active servers that will make ALFA as PW stand out.
Well, I was actually saying that we can have mostly inactive servers which do not have a detrimental effect on gameplay. We just need to keep the people looking for an ad-hoc game from logging into them and becoming disapointed.
Yeah but wouldn't that go against the entire idea of ALFA being made up of PW servers. You might speak of the pillars but in this case we would be forgetting what they support.
I think the "original" idea of ALFA was to recreate Faerun entire. To me, the best way to go about that is to support the largest number of playstyles you can which don't compromise the setting (and our standards, rules, etc). I think the tricky part is keeping the people who like a certain playstyle where they will enjoy themselves. Myself, I'm less picky, I've played nearly everywhere and liked it, with the exception of a few times where my prefered server was a server I DMed on.
User avatar
Voersaa
Shambling Zombie
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 10:46 am
Location: Denmark

Post by Voersaa »

I think that we are very close in how we view things Ronan. But when you speak of the idea being to "recreate Faerun entire" then we unfortunately have to look at the restrictions in doing so. We have to take baby steps and while we may initially have a great many new members joining us (as NWN2 ships) then we will also be seeing a great deal of swing door action as to how fast they will leave us.

I certainly don't mind a small group of players and a DM doing PnP action a couple of times a week. Unfortunately this in my experience have ended up alienating everyone else if the server only have one fairly active DM. Last I remember (before I stopped playing) TFN was more or less run by a one small group of elves.

We can't go out and try to sell ourselves as a PW and then have half our servers only doing 3 hour events a couple of times a week.
Suck FIST, vile demon! Er, well you WILL be sucking fists as soon as i can get past all theese damn tentacles to something that does the sucking... Oh dear lord, THAT'S not a tentacle!
User avatar
Mord
Specialist
Posts: 799
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 1974 12:41 am
Location: The north sea

Post by Mord »

Regardless of when we get live servers up and running, someone is bound to make at least one small server which facilitates roleplaying and adventuring to a degree we can slap on it or them the ALFA tag, them not being live is irrelevant.
HEEGZ
Dungeon Master
Posts: 7085
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 4:17 pm
Location: US CST

Post by HEEGZ »

Mordekai wrote:Regardless of when we get live servers up and running, someone is bound to make at least one small server which facilitates roleplaying and adventuring to a degree we can slap on it or them the ALFA tag, them not being live is irrelevant.
http://www.alandfaraway.org/phpbbforum/ ... hp?t=31341
User avatar
Mord
Specialist
Posts: 799
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 1974 12:41 am
Location: The north sea

Post by Mord »

We might need more than one server too accomodate all of ALFA though. :F
User avatar
Arkhaim
Goblin Scout
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:11 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by Arkhaim »

I voted option 1, but HEY FOLKS! I don't know about yall, but I for one plan and hope to be able to continue playing ALFA 1 till ALFA 2 is good to go and maybe then, if ALFA 1 is still around, I would play there as well, call me crazy but I like what you all have done and wish to get as much out of it as possible, NWN2 will be around for anywhere from 2-6 years (well how ever long it takes Bioware to finish Dragon Age). So what's the big rush? Give the builders, DMs, and Admin. time to get things worked out and lets not rush'em, m'kay? :lol:
Onward bound! Let us pursue this other life with the relentless vigor of a lich!


Current PC: Raziel Arkhaim
Server: Waterdeep

P.S. Check out the new NWN mod Darkness Over Daggerford! Premium Quality (if not better) at a great price - FREE!
Post Reply