Doors Question

ç i p h é r · Post by **ç i p h é r** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:03 pm

I know that some/many of you have been using the ALFA doors package Ronan put together a while back and hopefully you've had a chance to evaluate them in your modules. I'm planning to post a release of our door package on our project download page, so I'd like to take this opportunity to make any needed revisions, if any are required.

For those of you using the blueprints, what do you think of the "ALFA" classification? I have not adopted that convention elsewhere (for ABR) because I believe it's an unnecessary, and oft confusing, abstraction. Organizing blueprints by source isn't very useful, whereas organizing by type is. So to that end, would anyone object to removing the "ALFA" classification from the door blueprints at this juncture? It's a minor point so it's alright if you disapprove. You should be able to leave existing instances in the module as they are should we make that change.

Thanks.

indio · Post by **indio** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:06 pm

Happy to see it gone.

ç i p h é r · Post by **ç i p h é r** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:25 am

Ok, I added the doors to the v1.0 package since you all had them anyway.

Ronan · Post by **Ronan** » Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:20 pm

I put the "ALFA" prefix in there before I realized resources would have to be added to a campaign. Its sort of needed if they are not kept seperate from module or global resources, but as it is now I'd agree they can go. I just wouldn't remove "ALFA" from any resource we are planning on having the DM access from the Creator.