breachgnome PRC

Ideas and suggestions for game mechanics and rules.
Zelknolf
Chosen of Forumamus, God of Forums
Posts: 6139
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:04 pm

Re: breachgnome PRC

Post by Zelknolf »

Blindhamsterman wrote:are there any canon examples to prove the exceptions? Usually the best way to go...
As far as I'm aware, there's only one dwarven defender in Forgotten Realms canon-- Harbromm of Adbar is ftr 10/DwD 7 (and he's a dwarfey dwarf)

On the minus side, it doesn't give a very solid case for "Anyone should be able to take the class!" but it also doesn't make a very solid case for "Only dwarves should be able to take the class!" -- the RP and canon behind them doesn't seem to extend very far beyond "This is what happens when a tanky fighter tanks tankily tanky tank tank."

At the very least, defensive stance comes up in a few classes (Breachgnome and Defender of Sealtiel come to mind), and we quickly spiral into an unconquerable workload for very low yield (simply because so few ALFA PCs ever qualify for a PrC) if we try to implement everything as distinct classes-- unless we implement on an on-demand basis, but I'm not sure how efficient that would be.
User avatar
Galadorn
Haste Bear
Posts: 2483
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 9:10 am
Location: Hefei, China

Re: breachgnome PRC

Post by Galadorn »

I vote NO! Dwarves only got Dwarven Defender! mah gad let em 'ave it fer gad zakes!

And gnomes.... all gnomes.... should be all put on an island and napalmed anyway.

I vote Gnomiside.

go DD!

If you let Gnome Defenders in, GD will truly mean Gad Dam!
User avatar
hollyfant
Staff Head on a Pike - Standards
Posts: 3481
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: the Netherworl... lands! I meant the Netherlands.

Re: breachgnome PRC

Post by hollyfant »

It's not the East side or the West side.... it's the Gnomiside!
:dead: :lol:
Locked